2023-05-26：golang关于垃圾回收和析构函数的选择题，多数人会选错。

本文主要是介绍2023-05-26：golang关于垃圾回收和析构函数的选择题，多数人会选错。，对大家解决编程问题具有一定的参考价值，需要的程序猿们随着小编来一起学习吧！

2023-05-26：golang关于垃圾回收和析构的选择题，代码如下：

package main

import (
	"fmt"
	"runtime"
	"time"
)

type ListNode struct {
	Val  int
	Next *ListNode
}

func main0() {
	a := &ListNode{Val: 1}
	b := &ListNode{Val: 2}
	runtime.SetFinalizer(a, func(obj *ListNode) {
		fmt.Printf("a被回收--")
	})
	runtime.SetFinalizer(b, func(obj *ListNode) {
		fmt.Printf("b被回收--")
	})
	a.Next = b
	b.Next = a
}

func main() {
	main0()
	time.Sleep(1 * time.Second)
	runtime.GC()
	time.Sleep(1 * time.Second)
	runtime.GC()
	time.Sleep(1 * time.Second)
	runtime.GC()
	time.Sleep(1 * time.Second)
	runtime.GC()
	time.Sleep(1 * time.Second)
	runtime.GC()
	fmt.Print("结束")
}

代码的运行结果是什么？并说明原因。注意析构是无序的。

A. 结束

B. a被回收--b被回收--结束

C. b被回收--a被回收--结束

D. B和C都有可能

答案2023-05-26：

golang的垃圾回收算法跟java一样，都是根可达算法。代码中main0函数里a和b是互相引用，但是a和b没有外部引用。因此a和b会被当成垃圾被回收掉。而析构函数的调用不是有序的，所以B和C都有可能，答案选D。让我们看看答案是什么，如下：

看运行结果，答案不是选D，而是选A。这肯定会出乎很多人意料，golang的垃圾回收算法是根可达算法难不成是假的，大家公认的八股文难道是错的？有这个疑问是好事，但不能全盘否定。让我们看看析构函数的源码吧。代码在 src/runtime/mfinal.go 中，如下：

// SetFinalizer sets the finalizer associated with obj to the provided
// finalizer function. When the garbage collector finds an unreachable block
// with an associated finalizer, it clears the association and runs
// finalizer(obj) in a separate goroutine. This makes obj reachable again,
// but now without an associated finalizer. Assuming that SetFinalizer
// is not called again, the next time the garbage collector sees
// that obj is unreachable, it will free obj.
//
// SetFinalizer(obj, nil) clears any finalizer associated with obj.
//
// The argument obj must be a pointer to an object allocated by calling
// new, by taking the address of a composite literal, or by taking the
// address of a local variable.
// The argument finalizer must be a function that takes a single argument
// to which obj's type can be assigned, and can have arbitrary ignored return
// values. If either of these is not true, SetFinalizer may abort the
// program.
//
// Finalizers are run in dependency order: if A points at B, both have
// finalizers, and they are otherwise unreachable, only the finalizer
// for A runs; once A is freed, the finalizer for B can run.
// If a cyclic structure includes a block with a finalizer, that
// cycle is not guaranteed to be garbage collected and the finalizer
// is not guaranteed to run, because there is no ordering that
// respects the dependencies.
//
// The finalizer is scheduled to run at some arbitrary time after the
// program can no longer reach the object to which obj points.
// There is no guarantee that finalizers will run before a program exits,
// so typically they are useful only for releasing non-memory resources
// associated with an object during a long-running program.
// For example, an os.File object could use a finalizer to close the
// associated operating system file descriptor when a program discards
// an os.File without calling Close, but it would be a mistake
// to depend on a finalizer to flush an in-memory I/O buffer such as a
// bufio.Writer, because the buffer would not be flushed at program exit.
//
// It is not guaranteed that a finalizer will run if the size of *obj is
// zero bytes, because it may share same address with other zero-size
// objects in memory. See https://go.dev/ref/spec#Size_and_alignment_guarantees.
//
// It is not guaranteed that a finalizer will run for objects allocated
// in initializers for package-level variables. Such objects may be
// linker-allocated, not heap-allocated.
//
// Note that because finalizers may execute arbitrarily far into the future
// after an object is no longer referenced, the runtime is allowed to perform
// a space-saving optimization that batches objects together in a single
// allocation slot. The finalizer for an unreferenced object in such an
// allocation may never run if it always exists in the same batch as a
// referenced object. Typically, this batching only happens for tiny
// (on the order of 16 bytes or less) and pointer-free objects.
//
// A finalizer may run as soon as an object becomes unreachable.
// In order to use finalizers correctly, the program must ensure that
// the object is reachable until it is no longer required.
// Objects stored in global variables, or that can be found by tracing
// pointers from a global variable, are reachable. For other objects,
// pass the object to a call of the KeepAlive function to mark the
// last point in the function where the object must be reachable.
//
// For example, if p points to a struct, such as os.File, that contains
// a file descriptor d, and p has a finalizer that closes that file
// descriptor, and if the last use of p in a function is a call to
// syscall.Write(p.d, buf, size), then p may be unreachable as soon as
// the program enters syscall.Write. The finalizer may run at that moment,
// closing p.d, causing syscall.Write to fail because it is writing to
// a closed file descriptor (or, worse, to an entirely different
// file descriptor opened by a different goroutine). To avoid this problem,
// call KeepAlive(p) after the call to syscall.Write.
//
// A single goroutine runs all finalizers for a program, sequentially.
// If a finalizer must run for a long time, it should do so by starting
// a new goroutine.
//
// In the terminology of the Go memory model, a call
// SetFinalizer(x, f) “synchronizes before” the finalization call f(x).
// However, there is no guarantee that KeepAlive(x) or any other use of x
// “synchronizes before” f(x), so in general a finalizer should use a mutex
// or other synchronization mechanism if it needs to access mutable state in x.
// For example, consider a finalizer that inspects a mutable field in x
// that is modified from time to time in the main program before x
// becomes unreachable and the finalizer is invoked.
// The modifications in the main program and the inspection in the finalizer
// need to use appropriate synchronization, such as mutexes or atomic updates,
// to avoid read-write races.
func SetFinalizer(obj any, finalizer any) {
	if debug.sbrk != 0 {
		// debug.sbrk never frees memory, so no finalizers run
		// (and we don't have the data structures to record them).
		return
	}
	e := efaceOf(&obj)
	etyp := e._type
	if etyp == nil {
		throw("runtime.SetFinalizer: first argument is nil")
	}
	if etyp.kind&kindMask != kindPtr {
		throw("runtime.SetFinalizer: first argument is " + etyp.string() + ", not pointer")
	}
	ot := (*ptrtype)(unsafe.Pointer(etyp))
	if ot.elem == nil {
		throw("nil elem type!")
	}

	if inUserArenaChunk(uintptr(e.data)) {
		// Arena-allocated objects are not eligible for finalizers.
		throw("runtime.SetFinalizer: first argument was allocated into an arena")
	}

	// find the containing object
	base, _, _ := findObject(uintptr(e.data), 0, 0)

	if base == 0 {
		// 0-length objects are okay.
		if e.data == unsafe.Pointer(&zerobase) {
			return
		}

		// Global initializers might be linker-allocated.
		//	var Foo = &Object{}
		//	func main() {
		//		runtime.SetFinalizer(Foo, nil)
		//	}
		// The relevant segments are: noptrdata, data, bss, noptrbss.
		// We cannot assume they are in any order or even contiguous,
		// due to external linking.
		for datap := &firstmoduledata; datap != nil; datap = datap.next {
			if datap.noptrdata <= uintptr(e.data) && uintptr(e.data) < datap.enoptrdata ||
				datap.data <= uintptr(e.data) && uintptr(e.data) < datap.edata ||
				datap.bss <= uintptr(e.data) && uintptr(e.data) < datap.ebss ||
				datap.noptrbss <= uintptr(e.data) && uintptr(e.data) < datap.enoptrbss {
				return
			}
		}
		throw("runtime.SetFinalizer: pointer not in allocated block")
	}

	if uintptr(e.data) != base {
		// As an implementation detail we allow to set finalizers for an inner byte
		// of an object if it could come from tiny alloc (see mallocgc for details).
		if ot.elem == nil || ot.elem.ptrdata != 0 || ot.elem.size >= maxTinySize {
			throw("runtime.SetFinalizer: pointer not at beginning of allocated block")
		}
	}

	f := efaceOf(&finalizer)
	ftyp := f._type
	if ftyp == nil {
		// switch to system stack and remove finalizer
		systemstack(func() {
			removefinalizer(e.data)
		})
		return
	}

	if ftyp.kind&kindMask != kindFunc {
		throw("runtime.SetFinalizer: second argument is " + ftyp.string() + ", not a function")
	}
	ft := (*functype)(unsafe.Pointer(ftyp))
	if ft.dotdotdot() {
		throw("runtime.SetFinalizer: cannot pass " + etyp.string() + " to finalizer " + ftyp.string() + " because dotdotdot")
	}
	if ft.inCount != 1 {
		throw("runtime.SetFinalizer: cannot pass " + etyp.string() + " to finalizer " + ftyp.string())
	}
	fint := ft.in()[0]
	switch {
	case fint == etyp:
		// ok - same type
		goto okarg
	case fint.kind&kindMask == kindPtr:
		if (fint.uncommon() == nil || etyp.uncommon() == nil) && (*ptrtype)(unsafe.Pointer(fint)).elem == ot.elem {
			// ok - not same type, but both pointers,
			// one or the other is unnamed, and same element type, so assignable.
			goto okarg
		}
	case fint.kind&kindMask == kindInterface:
		ityp := (*interfacetype)(unsafe.Pointer(fint))
		if len(ityp.mhdr) == 0 {
			// ok - satisfies empty interface
			goto okarg
		}
		if iface := assertE2I2(ityp, *efaceOf(&obj)); iface.tab != nil {
			goto okarg
		}
	}
	throw("runtime.SetFinalizer: cannot pass " + etyp.string() + " to finalizer " + ftyp.string())
okarg:
	// compute size needed for return parameters
	nret := uintptr(0)
	for _, t := range ft.out() {
		nret = alignUp(nret, uintptr(t.align)) + uintptr(t.size)
	}
	nret = alignUp(nret, goarch.PtrSize)

	// make sure we have a finalizer goroutine
	createfing()

	systemstack(func() {
		if !addfinalizer(e.data, (*funcval)(f.data), nret, fint, ot) {
			throw("runtime.SetFinalizer: finalizer already set")
		}
	})
}

看代码，看不出什么。其端倪在注释中。注意如下注释：

// Finalizers are run in dependency order: if A points at B, both have

// finalizers, and they are otherwise unreachable, only the finalizer

// for A runs; once A is freed, the finalizer for B can run.

// If a cyclic structure includes a block with a finalizer, that

// cycle is not guaranteed to be garbage collected and the finalizer

// is not guaranteed to run, because there is no ordering that

// respects the dependencies.

这段英文翻译成中文如下：

Finalizers（终结器）按照依赖顺序运行：如果 A 指向 B，两者都有终结器，并且它们除此之外不可达，则仅运行 A 的终结器；一旦 A 被释放，可以运行 B 的终结器。如果一个循环结构包含一个具有终结器的块，则该循环体不能保证被垃圾回收并且终结器不能保证运行，因为没有符合依赖关系的排序方式。

这意思很明显了，析构函数会检查当前对象A是否有外部对象指向当前对象A。如果有外部对象指向当前对象A时，A的析构是无法执行的；如果有外部对象指向当前对象A时，A的析构才能执行。

代码中的a和b是循环依赖，当析构判断a和b时，都会有外部对象指向a和b，析构函数无法执行。析构无法执行，内存也无法回收。因此答案选A。

去掉析构函数后，a和b肯定会被释放的。不用析构函数去证明，那如何证明呢？用以下代码就可以证明，代码如下：

package main

import (
	"fmt"
	"runtime"
	"time"
)

type ListNode struct {
	Val  [1024 * 1024]bool
	Next *ListNode
}

func printAlloc() {
	var m runtime.MemStats
	runtime.ReadMemStats(&m)
	fmt.Printf("%d KB\n", m.Alloc/1024)
}

func main0() {
	printAlloc()
	a := &ListNode{Val: [1024 * 1024]bool{true}}
	b := &ListNode{Val: [1024 * 1024]bool{false}}

	a.Next = b
	b.Next = a

	// runtime.SetFinalizer(a, func(obj *ListNode) {
	// 	fmt.Printf("a被删除--")
	// })

	printAlloc()

}

func main() {
	fmt.Print("开始")
	main0()
	time.Sleep(1 * time.Second)
	runtime.GC()
	time.Sleep(1 * time.Second)
	runtime.GC()
	time.Sleep(1 * time.Second)
	runtime.GC()
	time.Sleep(1 * time.Second)
	runtime.GC()
	time.Sleep(1 * time.Second)
	runtime.GC()
	fmt.Print("结束")
	printAlloc()

}

根据运行结果，内存大小明显变小，说明a和b已经被回收了。

让我们再看看有析构函数的情况，运行结果是咋样的，如下：

package main

import (
	"fmt"
	"runtime"
	"time"
)

type ListNode struct {
	Val  [1024 * 1024]bool
	Next *ListNode
}

func printAlloc() {
	var m runtime.MemStats
	runtime.ReadMemStats(&m)
	fmt.Printf("%d KB\n", m.Alloc/1024)
}

func main0() {
	printAlloc()
	a := &ListNode{Val: [1024 * 1024]bool{true}}
	b := &ListNode{Val: [1024 * 1024]bool{false}}

	a.Next = b
	b.Next = a

	runtime.SetFinalizer(a, func(obj *ListNode) {
		fmt.Printf("a被删除--")
	})

	printAlloc()

}

func main() {
	fmt.Print("开始")
	main0()
	time.Sleep(1 * time.Second)
	runtime.GC()
	time.Sleep(1 * time.Second)
	runtime.GC()
	time.Sleep(1 * time.Second)
	runtime.GC()
	time.Sleep(1 * time.Second)
	runtime.GC()
	time.Sleep(1 * time.Second)
	runtime.GC()
	fmt.Print("结束")
	printAlloc()

}

根据运行结果，有析构函数的情况下，a和b确实是无法被回收。

总结

1.不要怀疑八股文的正确性，golang的垃圾回收确实是根可达算法。

2.不要用析构函数去测试无用对象被回收的情况，上面的例子也看到了，两对象的循环引用，析构函数的测试结果就是错误的。只能根据内存变化，看无用对象是否被回收。

3.在写代码的时候，能手动设置引用为nil，最好手动设置，这样能更好的避免内存泄漏。

这篇关于2023-05-26：golang关于垃圾回收和析构函数的选择题，多数人会选错。的文章就介绍到这儿，希望我们推荐的文章对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持为之网！